Seven stakeholder roles mapped across five buying stages, with engagement priorities at every intersection. The one-page operational framework most ABM programs never build.
Good ABM does not underperform because of bad account selection. It underperforms because most programs reach one or two people per account while the rest of the buying committee forms opinions, runs independent research, and builds objections, without any engagement from marketing.
This framework gives you a working map of every stakeholder role that appears in a B2B buying committee, the five stages of the buying journey they move through, and a clear priority rating for what marketing should be doing at each intersection.
Use it before you write a single brief. It will tell you exactly where your program has coverage and where it has gaps.
| Stakeholder | Awareness | Validation | Consensus | Approval | Purchase |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Economic Buyer | |||||
| Exec Sponsor | |||||
| Biz Champion | |||||
| Tech Evaluator | |||||
| Procurement | |||||
| Risk / Compliance | |||||
| End User |
Engagement priority: ●○○ Low · ●●○ Medium · ●●● High
The framing behind the framework: why most ABM programs underperform, the data on buying committee size, and how to use what follows. Sets up the matrix before you open it.
All seven stakeholder roles across all five buying stages. Every cell rated Low, Medium, or High engagement priority with dot indicators. The reference page you print and keep at your desk.
Every stakeholder gets a plain-language description, a specific content build list, and a practitioner tip drawn from real enterprise ABM programs. The operational layer that makes the matrix useful.
All five buying stages mapped to specific content types per stakeholder. The editorial planning layer. This is what you use to write the brief, not after it.
A fillable buying group roster, a coverage gap analysis table, and the diagnostic question that tells you whether your program is actually account-based or just relationship-based. Complete it with sales before your next campaign brief is written.
Use this to audit coverage on your tier-one accounts. If you cannot identify which stakeholders marketing has engaged at each stage, you have a gap, and this framework will show you exactly where it is.
Single-threaded accounts are fragile. This framework gives you a structured conversation to have with your sales and marketing team about what it actually takes to build institutional coverage, not just one good contact.
Map your existing content library against the framework. The gaps are your editorial calendar. The high-priority, under-covered cells are the briefings to write this quarter.
Buying group coverage is usually the structural lever that is cheapest to fix and most impactful on pipeline conversion. Start here before you increase spend.
Print it. Drop it in Notion. Use it in your next account planning session. No email required. Just download and use it.
Download Free PDFPDF · 5 pages · Cover, matrix, role breakdown, content priorities, and worksheet · Free from E.R.M. Advisory